« Home Is Where the Most Economically Beneficial Laws Are: Finding the Best Location to Incorporate Your Business | Main | The Sophisticated User Doctrine: Fair or Fowl »

April 25, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c766d53ef00e55210d9e38834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Blockbuster's $1 Billion Bid on Circuit City:

Comments

Smart decision by blockbuster to withdraw from this. I've never been a believer in unrelated companies merging, as it's very diffiuclt to enter a different market you are unfamiliar with.

True, both companies have similar financial predicaments, but as Warren Buffet says, stay within your core competencies.

As many predicted and as I noted here two days ago, Blockbuster has now withdrawn its offer for Circuit City and the merger is off:

"We have determined that it is not in the best interest of Blockbuster's shareholders to proceed with an acquisition of Circuit City," said Jim Keyes, Blockbuster's chief executive.

There hasn’t been much movement on this potential deal between Blockbuster and Circuit City. Many people believe that poor results from Circuit City have made it likely that Blockbuster will walk away from the deal. In fact, some think that the recent increases in Blockbuster's stock prices reflect the expectation that that the Company will not buy Circuit City.

Business combinations, merger, acquisition, and joint venture are not easy to execute and they most often don’t live up to their expectations. There have been several studies done on mergers and acquisitions announced in the last 20 years and in well over 60% of the cases the synergy was not realized. When synergy doesn’t materialize the acquiring company ends up damaging shareholder value because premiums paid to take a significant equity stake in a target company are not recouped. However, by understanding a company’s motives for buying, selling, or partnering a business, how the decision fits in with their overall corporate strategy, and the careful identification of the characteristics of an ideal target, the chances of success can be greatly increased. effective post merger integration is a big key to success.

The 10Q Detective opines that BBI’s play for the electronic gadgets retailer was an effort to turn Street attention away from its own business failings—and, a last-ditch effort to revive a moribund brick& mortar business model.

Does anyone remember the RadioShack - Blockbuster alliance? In June 2001, 130 “RadioShack Cool Things” boutiques opened in Blockbuster outlets--six months later BBI pulled the plug on the 'pilot program.'

Is BBI is headed for bankruptcy?

http://10qdetective.blogspot.com/2008/05/circuit-city-should-remind-blockbuster.html

This article made me aware of the happenings around.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

SEARCH







Invitation


  • We invite law professors, practitioners, and students to submit short articles for publication on this website. Simply email articles to the editors of the journal at buslaw@law.uiuc.edu. Moreover, if you have any ideas for topics or stories related to business law that we can cover, email them to us.

Comments


  • We strongly encourage readers to post comments or questions relating to a specific article or a topic covered by an article on the website. Just click on the "comments" link located in the post footer below each article. Be advised that the editors reserve the right to remove comments that contain abusive or foul language, advertisements, or spam.

DISCLAIMER


  • This journal is published by students of the University of Illinois College of Law. It is not a publication of the University of Illinois, and, therefore, the University of Illinois bears no responsibility for its content. Moreover, this Internet publication is prepared as an informational service only and should not be relied upon as legal advice. Lastly, although every attempt is made to ensure the information is accurate and timely, the information is presented "as is" and without warranties, either expressed or implied.

Rights Reserved